Table of Contents
Claim
Contra Arguments
Works citГ©es
The government allows different types of guns to increase protection for individuals or groups. People may have a positive attitude towards guns, but others can misuse that privilege for their own purposes. People who have guns in their lives are more likely to feel insecure. The United States of America has many states, each with its own gun control policies. There are increasing numbers of crimes and deaths in America, making gun control a contentious issue. Different groups and individuals have different opinions about how much regulation should be implemented and what kind. Americans who own guns want them to protect themselves, while those on the opposing side want them to be used for social and political purposes. The argumentative paper below discusses this issue.
Argument States with more relaxed gun control policies are seeing an increase of gun-related deaths, and crimes. Nisbet says that over 30,000 people are dying each year from gun-related accidents. The need to tighten gun laws in the United States is evident. Over 15,000 Americans were killed by guns, 12,000 Surname 2 died from suicide and the rest are victims of gun violence. However, gun-related injuries are accidental and intentional at over 40,000. These numbers are rising rapidly. Gun-related crimes account for over a million other crimes in America that have been recorded by the police. Because every American’s life is important, parties, groups and individuals are pushing for stricter national policies. This should help to reduce gun violence and legal protection. Gun control policies in the United States are too permissive. Criminals have more room to perpetrate their crimes, and others have time to take their own lives. In the end, innocent Americans suffer serious gun injuries or lose their lives. Gun control policies need to be tighter in order to decrease the number of deaths and rampage killings that claim American lives. Jacobs claims that multiple American killings could not have happened if guns were not available. If gun control policies were more strict, the Long Island Railroad massacre of December 7, 1993, Columbine school shootings in April 1999, and other multiple homicides wouldn’t have happened. The United States has many places where firearms aren’t allowed due to past experiences. There are still many other places that are prohibited. Americans cannot carry guns in places where alcohol is sold, schools and their surroundings, or places where people watch animal races are prohibited. This is despite it being rare. Since the 1992 investigation by the United State Center for Disease Control, Surname 3 began tracking violence in schools and deaths that were gun-related. The number of rampage victims is declining.
Because licensed dealers must pass a federal background test before selling firearms, the American government is making a stronger effort to control guns. A strict federal background check is required by licensed dealers before they sell firearms. Since most states don’t use the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, licensed gun dealers must contact the FBI directly. One may fail for various reasons. The FBI can perform a federal background check. They have access to all criminal records of citizens and can crosscheck this information to help decrease the sale of firearms to aspiring or former criminals. Gun control policies in most American states prohibit anyone who has been convicted of a crime punishable with more than one year imprisonment from purchasing firearms. Supporters of gun control argued that anyone who was convicted of a punishable crime for more than one year would be ineligible for federal background checks.
They may be able to use guns to commit some of the offenses that led them to prison. If a person has been convicted in any area of the country of domestic violence, they must pass the federal background test. Because they could have escaped or been convicted of a crime in another country, the FBI should be able to prohibit fugitives from purchasing firearms from licensed dealers.
Contra Arguments Gun control laws are not the right thing to advocate. Criminals can still obtain guns and break laws, and some gun control laws won’t stop them from doing so. Over 49 shooters were armed with legally acquired guns in the 62 mass shootings in the United States that occurred between 1982 and 2012. The killers also had 143 guns, most of which they obtained legally. Many gun-rights activists always want guns removed from most law-abiding citizens. Even though criminals are allowed to possess guns, they still ignore them. Anderson claimed that more than 37.4% of prisoners in state prisons who carried, used, or were in possession of firearms while they were committing crime, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics May 2013 report. These guns were acquired from family members or friends who have a license gun from their families. Chicago was banned from gun shops and assault weapons. It also bans high capacity magazines. Chicago saw nearly 390 murders in 2014 due to a total of 2,089 shooting deaths. Between 2001 and March, Chicago saw many guns recovered. 2012 saw the gun haul come from more than 50 states.
Gun control laws in America are often too powerful for the government. In many states, this leads to government tyranny. Citizens feel unsafe and their guns taken away by the government. According to Proscon.com nearly 57% of the respondents to the Pew Research survey in February 2013 stated that gun controls laws give too much power to the government, which makes them less effective. According to the National Rifle Association, the Second Amendment allowed Americans to live under King George’s tyranny. Surname 5 was all that was needed to ensure that all citizens were free from any new states. These states would not be subjugated by the tyrant leaders in the future. Piers Morgan revealed that the Second Amendment was not a duck hunting ground. They were meant to protect all citizens against the tyrannical government.
Gun control is not necessary in America as a whole. This is because very few people died from gun use. According to the Center for Disease Control, most deaths in America between 1999 and 2013 were due to medical reasons, not gun-related causes. Heart disease is responsible for 21.5 times as many deaths in America. A lot of America’s most fatal diseases can be attributed to the way they live. Proscon.com says that Americans are more susceptible to malignant tumors. They are estimated to cause nearly 8458,000 deaths annually. Meanwhile, other Americans are more at risk for sugar-related diseases such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s. Many Americans also die from flu, related pneumonia, and poisoning. This is despite the fact that they can be caused by suicide or accidental homicide. Also, traffic accidents claimed many more lives in the period 1999-2013 than gun-related deaths. From 1999 to 2013, deaths from firearms were the twelveth leading cause of death. The firearm homicides in America are often exaggerated and rank 28 in the global homicide rate. In 2012, there were three gun deaths per 100,000.
Gun control laws that ban assault weapons are not only trying to ban them in society but also invade the rights of gun owners who hunt and shoot for sport. America loves hunting. Surname 6 surveyed 13.7 Million hunters 16 and older in 2011, spending $7.7B on guns, ammunition, hunting gear, and other equipment. Citizens who enjoy hunting and participating in target shooting competitions are more inclined to choose high-powered shotguns and semiautomatic rifles.
According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, assault weapons are more commonly used and not less powerful than hunting rifles. Hunting and target-shooting competitions are great recreation options that can help increase unity among citizens.
This essay will conclude by saying that many gun control laws, policies and programs such as federal background checks and micro stamping are an invasion on citizens’ privacy. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System includes personal information like the names of gun owners, home addresses, criminal records and other details. The American Civil Liberties Union was concerned that the 2013 Senate background check legislation gave the government the power to maintain indefinitely gun purchases databases. This gun control legislation is a violation to privacy. People may be able to search the databases and see expansions for purposes that weren’t intended when they were collected. The other side is micro stamping. It requires a database containing the gun owners as well as the codes they would stamp on cartridges.
